DeMolay

Universe

 
DeMolay.org    forums.DeMolay.org    forums.DeMolay.org  Hop To Forum Categories  DeMolay Resources    Dad Land's Instructions on the LOH Nomination
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Forum Know-it-all
Picture of Dale Dietzman
Posted
It is always both a treat and an education to read Dad Frank Land's thoughts on matters of importance in DeMolay.

I was fortunate to find, in the detrius of an extinct Chapter of ancient lineage, an Active LOH Nomination form for the year 1937.

I am posting both the Requirements page and the text of Dad Land's address concerning whom the Legion of Honor was intended for. Circumstances have changed but I believe his thoughts still have great value for us all.

The following is the exact text of the Instruction Sheet that was part of the Active Legion of Honor Nomination for the Year 1937, issued over the signature of Frank S. Land, Secretary General.


quote:

QUALIFICATIONS

(A) The Nominee must be at least TWENTY-TWO YEARS of age ON OR BEFORE MARCH 1, 1937.

(B) Award in recognition of, or, a promising career of outstanding adult leadership in some field of worth-while endeavor that serves God, Country or Humanity.

(C) CITATION DOES NOT CONSIDER PAST DE MOLAY ACTIVITY OR LABOR, although desirable.

(D) The distinction will not be conferred upon any nominee whose character, reputation, or integrity is in doubt.

(E) Recommendation for this honor must be made by the Advisory Council of a Chapter on this form to the Member or Deputy of the Grand Council for your jurisdiction WHO MAY nominate, if he desires, to the Grand Council such nominees as he deems worthy of the decoration.

(F) A NOMINEE OR THE MEMBERSHIP OF A CHAPTER MUST HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ADVISORY COUNCIL. FAILURE TO OBSERVE SECRECY IN MAKING THIS NOMINATION DUBJECTS THE NOMINEE TO THE PENALTY OF NOT BEING CNSIDERED.

(G) A nomination will not be considered from a Chapter delinquent in its current Annual Report or Grand Council fees.

(H) One nominee may be submitted by a Member of Deputy of the Grand Council for every two hundred members in his jurisdiction during the preceding DeMolay Year as reported to the Secretary General in Chapter’s Annual Reports and such credits are cumulative.

Note: Question 14 in the attached Nomination Form also asked about the nominee “Has he received any of the following…
Representative DeMolay? …Degree of Chevalier? ….Achievement Award ?… Blue Honor Key?


As interesting as the above is, of far greater importance, philosophically, for all Advisors, is an additional sheet entitled “The Legion”, which was also included.

This provides, perhaps, the best possible guidance for each Advisor when considering whether to place a name in consideration, or to vote to submit a nomination. The original format is kept below.

“THE LEGION”

“The Legion of Honor is not a boy organization; it is composed solely of men, a part of whose boyhood was spent in DeMolay. It was never intended in the strictest sense as a decoration for work in DeMolay. The Legion of Honor was created for the purpose of banding together a selected few out of the many thousands who have knelt at the altar of DeMolay and who bore the stamp of possible leadership not only in their community but in national life as well, whether it be in a civic, industrial, professional, business or spiritual field of endeavor. A group of men who can be implicitly relied upon as the years pass to aid boyhood, to carry the ideals of DeMolay into every walk of life and to unswervingly uphold national ideals. The Mission of the Legion is to consecrate the heart and thought of its recipients to an unfaltering belief in God, a defense of the Public School System and a defense of the rights of all children. The Legion of Honor is to perpetuate the DeMolay of the future.

Out of the thousands of young men who are passing through DeMolay will come some of the world’s leaders. You may have in your community belonging to your Chapter a future Edison, a future Steinmetz, a future Lincoln or a future Luther. The leaders we are searching for may never have been active in your Chapter’s affairs, yet some training that you have given them will prove helpful in their leadership of the future. We do know that some of the young men who have passed through DeMolay are unmistakable developing into world leaders in their particular fields of endeavor. That we may find as many as possible within our number, and then nurture and aid them, is the aim of the Legion. You and your associates have many times probable predicted the future of some young man who has come under your observation. The Grand Council asks you in the spirit of intuition and prophesy to make only such nominations for the Legion of Honor, from those who have belonged to your Chapter, as you reasonable feel are gifted in some avenue of endeavor. With this though in mind it is only natural that more men who have never been active in DeMolay will receive this honor than those who have been Chapter leaders. In considering your nominations do not make your selections based on DeMolay activity. DeMolay Chapters develop not less than six thousand Master Councilors every year, and very few of those will ever reach high achievement. Do not consider a man because he has been a good working in your Chapter or because he happens to be the son or protégé of a very influential member of the Sponsoring Body or of your Board itself. The Grand Council is acting upon your recommendation at the Active Member or Deputy for your jurisdiction, takes your conclusion because you have a pride in selecting only young men whom you feel will develop into possible leaders. A young man may be ever so popular and yet his aim in life may be no higher than that of a clerkship or some obscure responsibility in which he will never be classed as a leader either in your community of in world affairs. We have literally thousands of these young men, most capable, honest, industrious, and very much worthwhile, but they do not measure up to the requirements of the Legion.
Young men in the profession deserve consideration and even young men who are agriculturists or those becoming junior partners or owners of business afford possible prophecy of leadership. Those in the fields of education, music, art, and letters prove very promising material. The young man who becomes a clergyman is afforded a splendid field for leadership. In fact any young man who is in training for some worthwhile endeavor, although his efforts may be in a obscure field of service, should command the attention and interest of every Advisory Council when considering nominations for the Legion.***We have enough honors at hand to enthuse and satisfy every young man who is active in the Order of DeMolay but the Legion of Honor must ever remain a goal of leadership, a pinnacle where the gifted mind becomes immortal in fruition. No young man who is being suggested for this honor should be acquainted with the information that he is even being considered. We realize that everyone who is nominated and elected will not come up to our full expectations, but of the number, if only a few attain the goal, all of the work and effort will be more than worthwhile in giving the world a contribution of devoted, consecrated leadership.”

FRANK S. LAND.
 
Posts: 1541 | Location: North Lauderdale, Florida, USA | Registered: Tue May 23, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Active Forum Member
Posted Hide Post
And soon hopefully one day - non-masons will be allowed to receive this honor - The honorary status, not Active, of course....
 
Posts: 170 | Location: East Moline, IL | Registered: Wed May 22, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Frequent Forum Contributor
Picture of P. W. Brusoe
Posted Hide Post
And soon hopefully one day - our membership troubles will be solved

And soon hopefully one day - our advisor shortage will be solved

And soon hopefully one day - we can put aside all petty titles and awards and work for the sheer benefit of youth

And soon hopefully one day - there will be world peace and we can all come together

And soon hopefully one day - it won't rain on sunny days.

There are a lot of problems out there, is this really that important?


*************
Peter W. Brusoe
 
Posts: 546 | Location: *** **** / Washington, DC | Registered: Mon September 16, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Forum Member
Picture of Rusty Pratt
Posted Hide Post
Is it really that important? I believe so.

Even Dad Land has demonstrated by the various awards and honors he established that it is in the best interest of the Order to recognize the efforts of both adults and adolescents when deemed outstanding and/or meritorious.

Over the course of it's history, the Supreme Council has adapted itselt, either by choice or necessity, to not restrict membership on an Advisory Council to only Master Masons. They have, over the years, opened the opportunity to serve as Advisors to Non-Masonic Senior DeMolays, Non-Masonic Fathers, and, now, women. It has even relaxed the requirement that the Chapter Advisor need be a Master Mason or Senior DeMolay.

Why allow hundreds of qualified men AND women to dedicate themselves to the service of the Order as Advisors and to work as hard as any other Masonic Advisor, but, deny them due and just recognition (i.e. the HLOH) simply because they don't wear the Square and Compasses on a ring on their hand?

We, as Masons, by our general lack of apathy, have opened "Advisorhood" to men and women of all walks of society due to our inability to produce enough Advisors from the Masonic Fraternity.

In otherwards, is our Masonic Fraternity saying to the Non-Masonic Advisors: "You can do our work, but, don't expect our honors?"
 
Posts: 51 | Location: Illinois | Registered: Sun May 08, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Frequent Forum Contributor
Picture of P. W. Brusoe
Posted Hide Post
The Cross of Honor is for both Genders, and is for serving as an advisor.


*************
Peter W. Brusoe
 
Posts: 546 | Location: *** **** / Washington, DC | Registered: Mon September 16, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Forum Member
Picture of Rusty Pratt
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by P. W. Brusoe:
The Cross of Honor is for both Genders, and is for serving as an advisor.


I understand that. I was making a point, though. Many, many non-Masons are out there that not only meet the criteria of high service to country, community and business, but, also, serve as Advisors.

Unfortunately, too many Advisory Councils nominate high ranking or well known Masons in their communities for the HLOH as a political move and forget those within their own backyard.

It is no different with some individuals that are nominated for Class 3 and/or Class 1 membership within the Supreme Council. Being a Past Grand Master of Masons or Past Eminent Grand Commander of Masonic Knights Templar should not be a qualification for consideration for membership on the Supreme Council. That is why we have the Honorary Supreme Council Membership.

I am pointing out that, unfortunately, there does exist a certain sense of elitism and hypocricy within our own DeMolay Family.

No, HLOH is not awarded based solely on DeMolay involvement, but it should be a consideration. Too many Masons that have never been DeMolays or served as an Advisor let alone have attended a DeMolay meeting are recipients of the HLOH.

What is wrong with (and this is only an example) awarding the HLOH to a female Advisor who is the mother of a DeMolay; has served as Worthy Matron of her Eastern Star Chapter; has served multiple terms on a City Council or Board; and, is a volunteer of many years at the local hospital? Hasn't she done much of what is expected from an HLOH recipient?

My point again is that there are many, many individuals, both male and female, that are excluded from the highest honor within the gift of the Supreme Council primarily because they do not belong to the Masonic Fraternity.
 
Posts: 51 | Location: Illinois | Registered: Sun May 08, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Frequent Forum Contributor
Picture of P. W. Brusoe
Posted Hide Post
I would agree that a lot of people are excluded from receiving honors and awards because they lack a qualification or to.

For example, Bill Clinton will never receive an alumni award from San Diego State. Why, he's not an alumnus.

George Bush will never receive KBE from Elizabeth the II, why, he's not British.

Some people will never get the federal government service award, why, because they are not employed by the federal government.

I will never get an award from the elks, why, because I am not an elk.

We establish honors with certain requirements that people need to meet, we should be really wary of making everything “oh, you’re a good person, here is the award.” Would we put Mick Jagger in the Baseball Hall of Fame? Probably not. Would we put Babe Ruth in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame? Probably not.

The real elitism and hypocrisy comes within our governance structures. Why aren’t Non-Masons on the Supreme Council? Why aren’t non-masons on the Board of Directors? Why aren’t non-masons on the foundation? Why aren’t non-masons allowed to serve as executive officers? (Please note I am not advocating that they should or should not be)

We are saying that “yes, it’s fine that you volunteer with the local level, you can even volunteer on the state level, but work in a manner to govern us, no.”

Again, I go back to my old point, we have larger and important issues that we need to address, then who do we give honors to.


*************
Peter W. Brusoe
 
Posts: 546 | Location: *** **** / Washington, DC | Registered: Mon September 16, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Forum Member
Posted Hide Post
I agree with you Peter in as much as our honors, and awards were created with a specific purpose in mind. To recognize an individual who meets specific requirements for a specific service.

Now, what some of the others on here don't realize is that yes, the power to alter these stringent guidelines does exist, and yes, steps are being made to alter these regulations to be more accepting.

This past year at Session, one of the call items that came up was whether or not to open up the HLOH to "Non-Masonic" adults.

I am of the belief that yes, we do need to devise a way to recognize the Non-Masonic Advisors who do so much for their Chapters, and I will agree that there are some Non-Masonic Advisors who work harder for their Chapters than some Masonic Advisors I know.

However, the Legion of Honor and the Honorary Legion of Honor were created with a specific focus for recognition, and if we change this focus, we alter everthing that this Honor has meant to those recipients of old.

Tristin H. Murphy, PSMC
Colorado DeMolay
Region 7 Coordinator
 
Posts: 46 | Location: Denver, Colorado, USA | Registered: Fri September 19, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Forum Member
Picture of Rusty Pratt
Posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by DSMCColorado:
However, the Legion of Honor and the Honorary Legion of Honor were created with a specific focus for recognition, and if we change this focus, we alter everthing that this Honor has meant to those recipients of old.

And yet the LOH was originally meant for Senior DeMolays. The HLOH was created later to recognize non-Senior DeMolays. Does the HLOH lessen the honor of the recipients of old that received the LOH prior to the creation of the HLOH? Or perhaps, and I'm playing Devil's advocate, Dad Land was wrong for not allowing Mother Chapter to limit it's membership to a maximum of 75? I mean, opening the membership beyond that original circle of friends I'm sure lessens the memory of our first DeMolays. Or perhaps all the young men that have joined the Order when they were younger than 16 has lessened the importance of the members that joined when the minimum age was at a higher number.

I am using sarcasm to try and make a point. We need to look "outside the box" and learn to "stretch the boundaries of our comfort zones" when dealing with our accepted policies and procedures.
 
Posts: 51 | Location: Illinois | Registered: Sun May 08, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Frequent Forum Contributor
Picture of P. W. Brusoe
Posted Hide Post
Being a rabid conservative, when the young men, in this case Bro. Murphy , speak, the old men should be quiet and take their lead, so I will not post about this topic again.

I will stress though that I can't imagine that this is the single most important issue that this organization faces.

I mean maybe I am wrong and NY is the *only* one that's having membership problems, advisor recruitment problems, retention issues, education issues, and issues with successful events. If I am, great, if not, I really think we have larger issues to worry about. Those are the areas we need to "stretch the boundaries of our comfort zones" on.


*************
Peter W. Brusoe
 
Posts: 546 | Location: *** **** / Washington, DC | Registered: Mon September 16, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Active Forum Member
Posted Hide Post
Peter, you are right...........

When are we going to start initiating girls? Smile
 
Posts: 170 | Location: East Moline, IL | Registered: Wed May 22, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Forum Member
Picture of Rusty Pratt
Posted Hide Post
If this topic was on Membership, I presume we would be discussing Membership, but, as Dad Dietzman began the topic as about LOH, why would we discuss Membership here?

Debate is essential on almost any topic.

Since my opinions, and that is all they are, are not in line with your conservative view (of which I am as well) am I to not express them, Bro. Brusoe?

Perhaps, if it is you that is so concerned with the question of Membership (which we all are concerned with, but not obsessed with), then you need to limit yourself to reading, replying and contributing to the forum topics that are only labeled Membership.

I mean no disrespect, Peter, but, because you don't agree with a topic or the views there in, do not presume to quiet the views of those commenting.
 
Posts: 51 | Location: Illinois | Registered: Sun May 08, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Frequent Forum Contributor
Picture of P. W. Brusoe
Posted Hide Post
"Dad" Haney,

We "induct" girls, not initiate. (Avoid the cult like image) My calendar is free for next Sunday, we can start then.

"Dad" Pratt, you can express your view, I am just done talking about the substantive issue, as the active DeMolay has spoken.



pwb


*************
Peter W. Brusoe
 
Posts: 546 | Location: *** **** / Washington, DC | Registered: Mon September 16, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Forum Know-it-all
Picture of Dale Dietzman
Posted Hide Post
Brothers,

Feel free to debate and discuss anything pertaining to DeMolay.

For what it is worth, this post was never meant to start a debate. The "DeMolay Resources" topic indicates it is a place to put copies of little known DeMolay materials which may be of wider interest and use than they are presently getting (my interpretation). In line with that, when I happened to get the actual text of Dad Land's thoughs concerning the LOH...and he does NOT address the HLOH here....I thought that some current Advisors MIGHT like to consider Frank's thoughts and beliefs when they were deciding whom to Nominate for this Honor.

There is precious little guidance on selecting Nominees for either the Legion or the Chev, except for some articles like this, (a bad omission in my opinion in the DAD program) and so when I find thee I post them, for anyone who wishes to reference them.

I do think some of this discussion would be more appropriate in some of the other Forum Topics, like DeMolay Debates, but do what you will.

Fraternally,


D.
 
Posts: 1541 | Location: North Lauderdale, Florida, USA | Registered: Tue May 23, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Frequent Forum Contributor
Picture of P. W. Brusoe
Posted Hide Post
As I used to tell our Current Grand Senior Steward:

"Wendell started it!"

pwb


*************
Peter W. Brusoe
 
Posts: 546 | Location: *** **** / Washington, DC | Registered: Mon September 16, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Forum Member
Picture of Rusty Pratt
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by P. W. Brusoe:
"Dad" Pratt, you can express your view, I am just done talking about the substantive issue, as the active DeMolay has spoken.


In reference the above statement, I feel much like Dr. Lyman Hall, a Mason and a Georgian representative to the Second Continental Congress in 1776, when he stated (and I paraphrase slightly) "It seems that Georgia (in reference to the topic of independency) is split down the middle; I am for it, and, they are against it."

In otherwords, the DeMolay Congress is against the "relaxation" of the Masonic membership requirement, and I am in favor of it.

But in my defense, hoping not to be labeled as an "Old Fart" trying to "run" the young men's organization, Dr. Hall continued his oratory before the Congress by quoting British statesman Edmund Burke saying (and, again I paraphrase slightly) "A representative of the people owes the people, not only his industry, but his judgment; and he betrays instead of serving the people if he sacrifices it to their opinion."

Therefore, with that in mind, I will continue to proport the idea of eliminating Masonic membership as an eligibility requirement for the HLOH, because I believe it to be the right thing to do.

Now, Peter, I, too, like you, am finished offering my comments (or arguements) relative to the topic.

I thank Dad Dietzman for the informative topic and apologize if in the natural course of events "Wendell" (Hahaha) turned it into a debate.
 
Posts: 51 | Location: Illinois | Registered: Sun May 08, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Forum Member
Posted Hide Post
An excellent point to make there Rusty. I agree completely that as a member of the Congress, it is my duty and obligation to represent the members of my Jurisdiction. I think that on occasion, and I am guilty of this myself, the delegates at Congress allow their personal feelings to interfere with their job of representing all of the DeMolays within their Jurisdiction, aand allow their prejudices to cloud their judgement when making decisions that will affect DI as a whole.

Something I have found though, is that it is extremely difficult to discover how our Jurisdicitons feel about the call items when we as delegates don't find out about them until the very last minute, something this years International Officers are looking to rectify.
 
Posts: 46 | Location: Denver, Colorado, USA | Registered: Fri September 19, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Forum Member
Posted Hide Post
Clarification for the posts above, the LOH is for Senior DeMolays regardless of being a Master Mason.

Does anyone have any thoughts on were the Medal of Appreciation should fit in all of this?


Steve Berry
Florida DeMolay
 
Posts: 12 | Registered: Fri March 10, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Forum Know-it-all
Picture of Dale Dietzman
Posted Hide Post
Bumping up since this is being asked about on another Thread.
 
Posts: 1541 | Location: North Lauderdale, Florida, USA | Registered: Tue May 23, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

DeMolay.org    forums.DeMolay.org    forums.DeMolay.org  Hop To Forum Categories  DeMolay Resources    Dad Land's Instructions on the LOH Nomination

© DeMolay International